This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled wireguard: allowedips: remove nodes in O(1) to the 5.12-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: wireguard-allowedips-remove-nodes-in-o-1.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.12 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From f634f418c227c912e7ea95a3299efdc9b10e4022 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 17:17:36 +0200 Subject: wireguard: allowedips: remove nodes in O(1) From: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@xxxxxxxxx> commit f634f418c227c912e7ea95a3299efdc9b10e4022 upstream. Previously, deleting peers would require traversing the entire trie in order to rebalance nodes and safely free them. This meant that removing 1000 peers from a trie with a half million nodes would take an extremely long time, during which we're holding the rtnl lock. Large-scale users were reporting 200ms latencies added to the networking stack as a whole every time their userspace software would queue up significant removals. That's a serious situation. This commit fixes that by maintaining a double pointer to the parent's bit pointer for each node, and then using the already existing node list belonging to each peer to go directly to the node, fix up its pointers, and free it with RCU. This means removal is O(1) instead of O(n), and we don't use gobs of stack. The removal algorithm has the same downside as the code that it fixes: it won't collapse needlessly long runs of fillers. We can enhance that in the future if it ever becomes a problem. This commit documents that limitation with a TODO comment in code, a small but meaningful improvement over the prior situation. Currently the biggest flaw, which the next commit addresses, is that because this increases the node size on 64-bit machines from 60 bytes to 68 bytes. 60 rounds up to 64, but 68 rounds up to 128. So we wind up using twice as much memory per node, because of power-of-two allocations, which is a big bummer. We'll need to figure something out there. Fixes: e7096c131e51 ("net: WireGuard secure network tunnel") Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c | 130 +++++++++++++++---------------------- drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.h | 9 -- 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c @@ -66,60 +66,6 @@ static void root_remove_peer_lists(struc } } -static void walk_remove_by_peer(struct allowedips_node __rcu **top, - struct wg_peer *peer, struct mutex *lock) -{ -#define REF(p) rcu_access_pointer(p) -#define DEREF(p) rcu_dereference_protected(*(p), lockdep_is_held(lock)) -#define PUSH(p) ({ \ - WARN_ON(IS_ENABLED(DEBUG) && len >= 128); \ - stack[len++] = p; \ - }) - - struct allowedips_node __rcu **stack[128], **nptr; - struct allowedips_node *node, *prev; - unsigned int len; - - if (unlikely(!peer || !REF(*top))) - return; - - for (prev = NULL, len = 0, PUSH(top); len > 0; prev = node) { - nptr = stack[len - 1]; - node = DEREF(nptr); - if (!node) { - --len; - continue; - } - if (!prev || REF(prev->bit[0]) == node || - REF(prev->bit[1]) == node) { - if (REF(node->bit[0])) - PUSH(&node->bit[0]); - else if (REF(node->bit[1])) - PUSH(&node->bit[1]); - } else if (REF(node->bit[0]) == prev) { - if (REF(node->bit[1])) - PUSH(&node->bit[1]); - } else { - if (rcu_dereference_protected(node->peer, - lockdep_is_held(lock)) == peer) { - RCU_INIT_POINTER(node->peer, NULL); - list_del_init(&node->peer_list); - if (!node->bit[0] || !node->bit[1]) { - rcu_assign_pointer(*nptr, DEREF( - &node->bit[!REF(node->bit[0])])); - kfree_rcu(node, rcu); - node = DEREF(nptr); - } - } - --len; - } - } - -#undef REF -#undef DEREF -#undef PUSH -} - static unsigned int fls128(u64 a, u64 b) { return a ? fls64(a) + 64U : fls64(b); @@ -224,6 +170,7 @@ static int add(struct allowedips_node __ RCU_INIT_POINTER(node->peer, peer); list_add_tail(&node->peer_list, &peer->allowedips_list); copy_and_assign_cidr(node, key, cidr, bits); + rcu_assign_pointer(node->parent_bit, trie); rcu_assign_pointer(*trie, node); return 0; } @@ -243,9 +190,9 @@ static int add(struct allowedips_node __ if (!node) { down = rcu_dereference_protected(*trie, lockdep_is_held(lock)); } else { - down = rcu_dereference_protected(CHOOSE_NODE(node, key), - lockdep_is_held(lock)); + down = rcu_dereference_protected(CHOOSE_NODE(node, key), lockdep_is_held(lock)); if (!down) { + rcu_assign_pointer(newnode->parent_bit, &CHOOSE_NODE(node, key)); rcu_assign_pointer(CHOOSE_NODE(node, key), newnode); return 0; } @@ -254,29 +201,37 @@ static int add(struct allowedips_node __ parent = node; if (newnode->cidr == cidr) { + rcu_assign_pointer(down->parent_bit, &CHOOSE_NODE(newnode, down->bits)); rcu_assign_pointer(CHOOSE_NODE(newnode, down->bits), down); - if (!parent) + if (!parent) { + rcu_assign_pointer(newnode->parent_bit, trie); rcu_assign_pointer(*trie, newnode); - else - rcu_assign_pointer(CHOOSE_NODE(parent, newnode->bits), - newnode); - } else { - node = kzalloc(sizeof(*node), GFP_KERNEL); - if (unlikely(!node)) { - list_del(&newnode->peer_list); - kfree(newnode); - return -ENOMEM; + } else { + rcu_assign_pointer(newnode->parent_bit, &CHOOSE_NODE(parent, newnode->bits)); + rcu_assign_pointer(CHOOSE_NODE(parent, newnode->bits), newnode); } - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&node->peer_list); - copy_and_assign_cidr(node, newnode->bits, cidr, bits); + return 0; + } + + node = kzalloc(sizeof(*node), GFP_KERNEL); + if (unlikely(!node)) { + list_del(&newnode->peer_list); + kfree(newnode); + return -ENOMEM; + } + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&node->peer_list); + copy_and_assign_cidr(node, newnode->bits, cidr, bits); - rcu_assign_pointer(CHOOSE_NODE(node, down->bits), down); - rcu_assign_pointer(CHOOSE_NODE(node, newnode->bits), newnode); - if (!parent) - rcu_assign_pointer(*trie, node); - else - rcu_assign_pointer(CHOOSE_NODE(parent, node->bits), - node); + rcu_assign_pointer(down->parent_bit, &CHOOSE_NODE(node, down->bits)); + rcu_assign_pointer(CHOOSE_NODE(node, down->bits), down); + rcu_assign_pointer(newnode->parent_bit, &CHOOSE_NODE(node, newnode->bits)); + rcu_assign_pointer(CHOOSE_NODE(node, newnode->bits), newnode); + if (!parent) { + rcu_assign_pointer(node->parent_bit, trie); + rcu_assign_pointer(*trie, node); + } else { + rcu_assign_pointer(node->parent_bit, &CHOOSE_NODE(parent, node->bits)); + rcu_assign_pointer(CHOOSE_NODE(parent, node->bits), node); } return 0; } @@ -335,9 +290,30 @@ int wg_allowedips_insert_v6(struct allow void wg_allowedips_remove_by_peer(struct allowedips *table, struct wg_peer *peer, struct mutex *lock) { + struct allowedips_node *node, *child, *tmp; + + if (list_empty(&peer->allowedips_list)) + return; ++table->seq; - walk_remove_by_peer(&table->root4, peer, lock); - walk_remove_by_peer(&table->root6, peer, lock); + list_for_each_entry_safe(node, tmp, &peer->allowedips_list, peer_list) { + list_del_init(&node->peer_list); + RCU_INIT_POINTER(node->peer, NULL); + if (node->bit[0] && node->bit[1]) + continue; + child = rcu_dereference_protected( + node->bit[!rcu_access_pointer(node->bit[0])], + lockdep_is_held(lock)); + if (child) + child->parent_bit = node->parent_bit; + *rcu_dereference_protected(node->parent_bit, lockdep_is_held(lock)) = child; + kfree_rcu(node, rcu); + + /* TODO: Note that we currently don't walk up and down in order to + * free any potential filler nodes. This means that this function + * doesn't free up as much as it could, which could be revisited + * at some point. + */ + } } int wg_allowedips_read_node(struct allowedips_node *node, u8 ip[16], u8 *cidr) --- a/drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.h @@ -15,14 +15,11 @@ struct wg_peer; struct allowedips_node { struct wg_peer __rcu *peer; struct allowedips_node __rcu *bit[2]; - /* While it may seem scandalous that we waste space for v4, - * we're alloc'ing to the nearest power of 2 anyway, so this - * doesn't actually make a difference. - */ - u8 bits[16] __aligned(__alignof(u64)); u8 cidr, bit_at_a, bit_at_b, bitlen; + u8 bits[16] __aligned(__alignof(u64)); - /* Keep rarely used list at bottom to be beyond cache line. */ + /* Keep rarely used members at bottom to be beyond cache line. */ + struct allowedips_node *__rcu *parent_bit; /* XXX: this puts us at 68->128 bytes instead of 60->64 bytes!! */ union { struct list_head peer_list; struct rcu_head rcu; Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from Jason@xxxxxxxxx are queue-5.12/wireguard-use-synchronize_net-rather-than-synchronize_rcu.patch queue-5.12/wireguard-do-not-use-o3.patch queue-5.12/wireguard-allowedips-allocate-nodes-in-kmem_cache.patch queue-5.12/wireguard-allowedips-initialize-list-head-in-selftest.patch queue-5.12/wireguard-selftests-remove-old-conntrack-kconfig-value.patch queue-5.12/wireguard-peer-allocate-in-kmem_cache.patch queue-5.12/wireguard-allowedips-remove-nodes-in-o-1.patch queue-5.12/wireguard-selftests-make-sure-rp_filter-is-disabled-on-vethc.patch queue-5.12/wireguard-allowedips-free-empty-intermediate-nodes-when-removing-single-node.patch