This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
tipc: fix unique bearer names sanity check
to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
tipc-fix-unique-bearer-names-sanity-check.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
commit 75e669b555e0aa16c0146bc78b4743624cbaff4d
Author: Hoang Le <hoang.h.le@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Apr 1 09:30:48 2021 +0700
tipc: fix unique bearer names sanity check
[ Upstream commit f20a46c3044c3f75232b3d0e2d09af9b25efaf45 ]
When enabling a bearer by name, we don't sanity check its name with
higher slot in bearer list. This may have the effect that the name
of an already enabled bearer bypasses the check.
To fix the above issue, we just perform an extra checking with all
existing bearers.
Fixes: cb30a63384bc9 ("tipc: refactor function tipc_enable_bearer()")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hoang Le <hoang.h.le@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/net/tipc/bearer.c b/net/tipc/bearer.c
index 0e0161597749..8bd2454cc89d 100644
--- a/net/tipc/bearer.c
+++ b/net/tipc/bearer.c
@@ -245,6 +245,7 @@ static int tipc_enable_bearer(struct net *net, const char *name,
int bearer_id = 0;
int res = -EINVAL;
char *errstr = "";
+ u32 i;
if (!bearer_name_validate(name, &b_names)) {
errstr = "illegal name";
@@ -269,31 +270,38 @@ static int tipc_enable_bearer(struct net *net, const char *name,
prio = m->priority;
/* Check new bearer vs existing ones and find free bearer id if any */
- while (bearer_id < MAX_BEARERS) {
- b = rtnl_dereference(tn->bearer_list[bearer_id]);
- if (!b)
- break;
+ bearer_id = MAX_BEARERS;
+ i = MAX_BEARERS;
+ while (i-- != 0) {
+ b = rtnl_dereference(tn->bearer_list[i]);
+ if (!b) {
+ bearer_id = i;
+ continue;
+ }
if (!strcmp(name, b->name)) {
errstr = "already enabled";
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Already enabled");
goto rejected;
}
- bearer_id++;
- if (b->priority != prio)
- continue;
- if (++with_this_prio <= 2)
- continue;
- pr_warn("Bearer <%s>: already 2 bearers with priority %u\n",
- name, prio);
- if (prio == TIPC_MIN_LINK_PRI) {
- errstr = "cannot adjust to lower";
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Cannot adjust to lower");
- goto rejected;
+
+ if (b->priority == prio &&
+ (++with_this_prio > 2)) {
+ pr_warn("Bearer <%s>: already 2 bearers with priority %u\n",
+ name, prio);
+
+ if (prio == TIPC_MIN_LINK_PRI) {
+ errstr = "cannot adjust to lower";
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Cannot adjust to lower");
+ goto rejected;
+ }
+
+ pr_warn("Bearer <%s>: trying with adjusted priority\n",
+ name);
+ prio--;
+ bearer_id = MAX_BEARERS;
+ i = MAX_BEARERS;
+ with_this_prio = 1;
}
- pr_warn("Bearer <%s>: trying with adjusted priority\n", name);
- prio--;
- bearer_id = 0;
- with_this_prio = 1;
}
if (bearer_id >= MAX_BEARERS) {
