This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled KVM: VMX: Disable preemption when probing user return MSRs to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: kvm-vmx-disable-preemption-when-probing-user-return-msrs.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From 5104d7ffcf24749939bea7fdb5378d186473f890 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 10:17:24 -0700 Subject: KVM: VMX: Disable preemption when probing user return MSRs From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> commit 5104d7ffcf24749939bea7fdb5378d186473f890 upstream. Disable preemption when probing a user return MSR via RDSMR/WRMSR. If the MSR holds a different value per logical CPU, the WRMSR could corrupt the host's value if KVM is preempted between the RDMSR and WRMSR, and then rescheduled on a different CPU. Opportunistically land the helper in common x86, SVM will use the helper in a future commit. Fixes: 4be534102624 ("KVM: VMX: Initialize vmx->guest_msrs[] right after allocation") Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-Id: <20210504171734.1434054-6-seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 5 +---- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -1668,6 +1668,7 @@ int kvm_pv_send_ipi(struct kvm *kvm, uns unsigned long icr, int op_64_bit); void kvm_define_user_return_msr(unsigned index, u32 msr); +int kvm_probe_user_return_msr(u32 msr); int kvm_set_user_return_msr(unsigned index, u64 val, u64 mask); u64 kvm_scale_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 tsc); --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c @@ -6864,12 +6864,9 @@ static int vmx_create_vcpu(struct kvm_vc for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vmx_uret_msrs_list); ++i) { u32 index = vmx_uret_msrs_list[i]; - u32 data_low, data_high; int j = vmx->nr_uret_msrs; - if (rdmsr_safe(index, &data_low, &data_high) < 0) - continue; - if (wrmsr_safe(index, data_low, data_high) < 0) + if (kvm_probe_user_return_msr(index)) continue; vmx->guest_uret_msrs[j].slot = i; --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -322,6 +322,22 @@ static void kvm_on_user_return(struct us } } +int kvm_probe_user_return_msr(u32 msr) +{ + u64 val; + int ret; + + preempt_disable(); + ret = rdmsrl_safe(msr, &val); + if (ret) + goto out; + ret = wrmsrl_safe(msr, val); +out: + preempt_enable(); + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_probe_user_return_msr); + void kvm_define_user_return_msr(unsigned slot, u32 msr) { BUG_ON(slot >= KVM_MAX_NR_USER_RETURN_MSRS); Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx are queue-5.10/kvm-vmx-disable-preemption-when-probing-user-return-msrs.patch queue-5.10/kvm-vmx-do-not-advertise-rdpid-if-enable_rdtscp-control-is-unsupported.patch queue-5.10/crypto-ccp-free-sev-device-if-sev-init-fails.patch queue-5.10/kvm-x86-mmu-remove-the-defunct-update_pte-paging-hook.patch queue-5.10/kvm-lapic-accurately-guarantee-busy-wait-for-timer-t.patch queue-5.10/kvm-x86-move-rdpid-emulation-intercept-to-its-own-enum.patch queue-5.10/kvm-x86-emulate-rdpid-only-if-rdtscp-is-supported.patch