Patch "xhci: Do not use GFP_KERNEL in (potentially) atomic context" has been added to the 5.12-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    xhci: Do not use GFP_KERNEL in (potentially) atomic context

to the 5.12-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     xhci-do-not-use-gfp_kernel-in-potentially-atomic-context.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.12 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From dda32c00c9a0fa103b5d54ef72c477b7aa993679 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 11:08:14 +0300
Subject: xhci: Do not use GFP_KERNEL in (potentially) atomic context

From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit dda32c00c9a0fa103b5d54ef72c477b7aa993679 upstream.

'xhci_urb_enqueue()' is passed a 'mem_flags' argument, because "URBs may be
submitted in interrupt context" (see comment related to 'usb_submit_urb()'
in 'drivers/usb/core/urb.c')

So this flag should be used in all the calling chain.
Up to now, 'xhci_check_maxpacket()' which is only called from
'xhci_urb_enqueue()', uses GFP_KERNEL.

Be safe and pass the mem_flags to this function as well.

Fixes: ddba5cd0aeff ("xhci: Use command structures when queuing commands on the command ring")
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210512080816.866037-4-mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/usb/host/xhci.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
@@ -1514,7 +1514,7 @@ static int xhci_configure_endpoint(struc
  * we need to issue an evaluate context command and wait on it.
  */
 static int xhci_check_maxpacket(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, unsigned int slot_id,
-		unsigned int ep_index, struct urb *urb)
+		unsigned int ep_index, struct urb *urb, gfp_t mem_flags)
 {
 	struct xhci_container_ctx *out_ctx;
 	struct xhci_input_control_ctx *ctrl_ctx;
@@ -1545,7 +1545,7 @@ static int xhci_check_maxpacket(struct x
 		 * changes max packet sizes.
 		 */
 
-		command = xhci_alloc_command(xhci, true, GFP_KERNEL);
+		command = xhci_alloc_command(xhci, true, mem_flags);
 		if (!command)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -1639,7 +1639,7 @@ static int xhci_urb_enqueue(struct usb_h
 		 */
 		if (urb->dev->speed == USB_SPEED_FULL) {
 			ret = xhci_check_maxpacket(xhci, slot_id,
-					ep_index, urb);
+					ep_index, urb, mem_flags);
 			if (ret < 0) {
 				xhci_urb_free_priv(urb_priv);
 				urb->hcpriv = NULL;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx are

queue-5.12/usb-fotg210-hcd-fix-an-error-message.patch
queue-5.12/usb-musb-fix-an-error-message.patch
queue-5.12/acpi-scan-fix-a-memory-leak-in-an-error-handling-pat.patch
queue-5.12/xhci-do-not-use-gfp_kernel-in-potentially-atomic-context.patch



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux