This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
locking/qrwlock: Fix ordering in queued_write_lock_slowpath()
to the 5.11-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
locking-qrwlock-fix-ordering-in-queued_write_lock_sl.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.11 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
commit b697b00a53c4cb3e2d32ca117167e23915e7552c
Author: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Apr 15 17:27:11 2021 +0000
locking/qrwlock: Fix ordering in queued_write_lock_slowpath()
[ Upstream commit 84a24bf8c52e66b7ac89ada5e3cfbe72d65c1896 ]
While this code is executed with the wait_lock held, a reader can
acquire the lock without holding wait_lock. The writer side loops
checking the value with the atomic_cond_read_acquire(), but only truly
acquires the lock when the compare-and-exchange is completed
successfully which isnâ??t ordered. This exposes the window between the
acquire and the cmpxchg to an A-B-A problem which allows reads
following the lock acquisition to observe values speculatively before
the write lock is truly acquired.
We've seen a problem in epoll where the reader does a xchg while
holding the read lock, but the writer can see a value change out from
under it.
Writer | Reader
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ep_scan_ready_list() |
|- write_lock_irq() |
|- queued_write_lock_slowpath() |
|- atomic_cond_read_acquire() |
| read_lock_irqsave(&ep->lock, flags);
--> (observes value before unlock) | chain_epi_lockless()
| | epi->next = xchg(&ep->ovflist, epi);
| | read_unlock_irqrestore(&ep->lock, flags);
| |
| atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed() |
|-- READ_ONCE(ep->ovflist); |
A core can order the read of the ovflist ahead of the
atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(). Switching the cmpxchg to use acquire
semantics addresses this issue at which point the atomic_cond_read can
be switched to use relaxed semantics.
Fixes: b519b56e378ee ("locking/qrwlock: Use atomic_cond_read_acquire() when spinning in qrwlock")
Signed-off-by: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@xxxxxxxxxx>
[peterz: use try_cmpxchg()]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
index fe9ca92faa2a..909b0bf22a1e 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
@@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_read_lock_slowpath);
*/
void queued_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
{
+ int cnts;
+
/* Put the writer into the wait queue */
arch_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
@@ -74,9 +76,8 @@ void queued_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
/* When no more readers or writers, set the locked flag */
do {
- atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->cnts, VAL == _QW_WAITING);
- } while (atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(&lock->cnts, _QW_WAITING,
- _QW_LOCKED) != _QW_WAITING);
+ cnts = atomic_cond_read_relaxed(&lock->cnts, VAL == _QW_WAITING);
+ } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->cnts, &cnts, _QW_LOCKED));
unlock:
arch_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
}
