Patch "file: fix close_range() for unshare+cloexec" has been added to the 5.11-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    file: fix close_range() for unshare+cloexec

to the 5.11-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     file-fix-close_range-for-unshare-cloexec.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.11 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From 9b5b872215fe6d1ca6a1ef411f130bd58e269012 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 10:29:36 +0200
Subject: file: fix close_range() for unshare+cloexec

From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 9b5b872215fe6d1ca6a1ef411f130bd58e269012 upstream.

syzbot reported a bug when putting the last reference to a tasks file
descriptor table. Debugging this showed we didn't recalculate the
current maximum fd number for CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE | CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC
after we unshared the file descriptors table. So max_fd could exceed the
current fdtable maximum causing us to set excessive bits. As a concrete
example, let's say the user requested everything from fd 4 to ~0UL to be
closed and their current fdtable size is 256 with their highest open fd
being 4. With CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE the caller will end up with a new
fdtable which has room for 64 file descriptors since that is the lowest
fdtable size we accept. But now max_fd will still point to 255 and needs
to be adjusted. Fix this by retrieving the correct maximum fd value in
__range_cloexec().

Reported-by: syzbot+283ce5a46486d6acdbaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 582f1fb6b721 ("fs, close_range: add flag CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC")
Fixes: fec8a6a69103 ("close_range: unshare all fds for CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE | CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC")
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Cc: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/file.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/file.c
@@ -629,17 +629,30 @@ int close_fd(unsigned fd)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(close_fd); /* for ksys_close() */
 
+/**
+ * last_fd - return last valid index into fd table
+ * @cur_fds: files struct
+ *
+ * Context: Either rcu read lock or files_lock must be held.
+ *
+ * Returns: Last valid index into fdtable.
+ */
+static inline unsigned last_fd(struct fdtable *fdt)
+{
+	return fdt->max_fds - 1;
+}
+
 static inline void __range_cloexec(struct files_struct *cur_fds,
 				   unsigned int fd, unsigned int max_fd)
 {
 	struct fdtable *fdt;
 
-	if (fd > max_fd)
-		return;
-
+	/* make sure we're using the correct maximum value */
 	spin_lock(&cur_fds->file_lock);
 	fdt = files_fdtable(cur_fds);
-	bitmap_set(fdt->close_on_exec, fd, max_fd - fd + 1);
+	max_fd = min(last_fd(fdt), max_fd);
+	if (fd <= max_fd)
+		bitmap_set(fdt->close_on_exec, fd, max_fd - fd + 1);
 	spin_unlock(&cur_fds->file_lock);
 }
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx are

queue-5.11/file-fix-close_range-for-unshare-cloexec.patch



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux