Patch "tracing: Fix stack trace event size" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    tracing: Fix stack trace event size

to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     tracing-fix-stack-trace-event-size.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From 9deb193af69d3fd6dd8e47f292b67c805a787010 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:54:40 -0400
Subject: tracing: Fix stack trace event size

From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 9deb193af69d3fd6dd8e47f292b67c805a787010 upstream.

Commit cbc3b92ce037 fixed an issue to modify the macros of the stack trace
event so that user space could parse it properly. Originally the stack
trace format to user space showed that the called stack was a dynamic
array. But it is not actually a dynamic array, in the way that other
dynamic event arrays worked, and this broke user space parsing for it. The
update was to make the array look to have 8 entries in it. Helper
functions were added to make it parse it correctly, as the stack was
dynamic, but was determined by the size of the event stored.

Although this fixed user space on how it read the event, it changed the
internal structure used for the stack trace event. It changed the array
size from [0] to [8] (added 8 entries). This increased the size of the
stack trace event by 8 words. The size reserved on the ring buffer was the
size of the stack trace event plus the number of stack entries found in
the stack trace. That commit caused the amount to be 8 more than what was
needed because it did not expect the caller field to have any size. This
produced 8 entries of garbage (and reading random data) from the stack
trace event:

          <idle>-0       [002] d... 1976396.837549: <stack trace>
 => trace_event_raw_event_sched_switch
 => __traceiter_sched_switch
 => __schedule
 => schedule_idle
 => do_idle
 => cpu_startup_entry
 => secondary_startup_64_no_verify
 => 0xc8c5e150ffff93de
 => 0xffff93de
 => 0
 => 0
 => 0xc8c5e17800000000
 => 0x1f30affff93de
 => 0x00000004
 => 0x200000000

Instead, subtract the size of the caller field from the size of the event
to make sure that only the amount needed to store the stack trace is
reserved.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/your-ad-here.call-01617191565-ext-9692@work.hours/

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: cbc3b92ce037 ("tracing: Set kernel_stack's caller size properly")
Reported-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/trace/trace.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -2984,7 +2984,8 @@ static void __ftrace_trace_stack(struct
 
 	size = nr_entries * sizeof(unsigned long);
 	event = __trace_buffer_lock_reserve(buffer, TRACE_STACK,
-					    sizeof(*entry) + size, flags, pc);
+				    (sizeof(*entry) - sizeof(entry->caller)) + size,
+				    flags, pc);
 	if (!event)
 		goto out;
 	entry = ring_buffer_event_data(event);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx are

queue-5.10/tracing-fix-stack-trace-event-size.patch



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux