Patch "ext4: add reclaim checks to xattr code" has been added to the 5.4-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ext4: add reclaim checks to xattr code

to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     ext4-add-reclaim-checks-to-xattr-code.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From 163f0ec1df33cf468509ff38cbcbb5eb0d7fac60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 18:16:26 +0100
Subject: ext4: add reclaim checks to xattr code

From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

commit 163f0ec1df33cf468509ff38cbcbb5eb0d7fac60 upstream.

Syzbot is reporting that ext4 can enter fs reclaim from kvmalloc() while
the transaction is started like:

  fs_reclaim_acquire+0x117/0x150 mm/page_alloc.c:4340
  might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:193 [inline]
  slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:493 [inline]
  slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:2817 [inline]
  __kmalloc_node+0x5f/0x430 mm/slub.c:4015
  kmalloc_node include/linux/slab.h:575 [inline]
  kvmalloc_node+0x61/0xf0 mm/util.c:587
  kvmalloc include/linux/mm.h:781 [inline]
  ext4_xattr_inode_cache_find fs/ext4/xattr.c:1465 [inline]
  ext4_xattr_inode_lookup_create fs/ext4/xattr.c:1508 [inline]
  ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x1ce6/0x3780 fs/ext4/xattr.c:1649
  ext4_xattr_ibody_set+0x78/0x2b0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2224
  ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x8f4/0x13e0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2380
  ext4_xattr_set+0x13a/0x340 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2493

This should be impossible since transaction start sets PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS.
Add some assertions to the code to catch if something isn't working as
expected early.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/000000000000563a0205bafb7970@xxxxxxxxxx/
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210222171626.21884-1-jack@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/ext4/xattr.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
@@ -1476,6 +1476,9 @@ ext4_xattr_inode_cache_find(struct inode
 	if (!ce)
 		return NULL;
 
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(ext4_handle_valid(journal_current_handle()) &&
+		     !(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS));
+
 	ea_data = ext4_kvmalloc(value_len, GFP_NOFS);
 	if (!ea_data) {
 		mb_cache_entry_put(ea_inode_cache, ce);
@@ -2342,6 +2345,7 @@ ext4_xattr_set_handle(handle_t *handle,
 			error = -ENOSPC;
 			goto cleanup;
 		}
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(!(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS));
 	}
 
 	error = ext4_reserve_inode_write(handle, inode, &is.iloc);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jack@xxxxxxx are

queue-5.4/ext4-add-reclaim-checks-to-xattr-code.patch



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux