Patch "perf/x86/intel: Fix a crash caused by zero PEBS status" has been added to the 5.11-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    perf/x86/intel: Fix a crash caused by zero PEBS status

to the 5.11-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     perf-x86-intel-fix-a-crash-caused-by-zero-pebs-status.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.11 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From d88d05a9e0b6d9356e97129d4ff9942d765f46ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 05:21:37 -0800
Subject: perf/x86/intel: Fix a crash caused by zero PEBS status

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit d88d05a9e0b6d9356e97129d4ff9942d765f46ea upstream.

A repeatable crash can be triggered by the perf_fuzzer on some Haswell
system.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7170d3b-c17f-1ded-52aa-cc6d9ae999f4@xxxxxxxxx/

For some old CPUs (HSW and earlier), the PEBS status in a PEBS record
may be mistakenly set to 0. To minimize the impact of the defect, the
commit was introduced to try to avoid dropping the PEBS record for some
cases. It adds a check in the intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(), and updates
the local pebs_status accordingly. However, it doesn't correct the PEBS
status in the PEBS record, which may trigger the crash, especially for
the large PEBS.

It's possible that all the PEBS records in a large PEBS have the PEBS
status 0. If so, the first get_next_pebs_record_by_bit() in the
__intel_pmu_pebs_event() returns NULL. The at = NULL. Since it's a large
PEBS, the 'count' parameter must > 1. The second
get_next_pebs_record_by_bit() will crash.

Besides the local pebs_status, correct the PEBS status in the PEBS
record as well.

Fixes: 01330d7288e0 ("perf/x86: Allow zero PEBS status with only single active event")
Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@xxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1615555298-140216-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -1899,7 +1899,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(str
 		 */
 		if (!pebs_status && cpuc->pebs_enabled &&
 			!(cpuc->pebs_enabled & (cpuc->pebs_enabled-1)))
-			pebs_status = cpuc->pebs_enabled;
+			pebs_status = p->status = cpuc->pebs_enabled;
 
 		bit = find_first_bit((unsigned long *)&pebs_status,
 					x86_pmu.max_pebs_events);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are

queue-5.11/perf-x86-intel-fix-a-crash-caused-by-zero-pebs-status.patch
queue-5.11/perf-x86-intel-fix-unchecked-msr-access-error-caused-by-vlbr_event.patch



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux