This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled xfs: revert "xfs: fix rmap key and record comparison functions" to the 5.9-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: xfs-revert-xfs-fix-rmap-key-and-record-comparison-fu.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.9 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. commit 3ac3a50ac1d382b8f5b18bc3dcd54d94225ff4a9 Author: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Nov 19 15:17:50 2020 -0800 xfs: revert "xfs: fix rmap key and record comparison functions" [ Upstream commit eb8409071a1d47e3593cfe077107ac46853182ab ] This reverts commit 6ff646b2ceb0eec916101877f38da0b73e3a5b7f. Your maintainer committed a major braino in the rmap code by adding the attr fork, bmbt, and unwritten extent usage bits into rmap record key comparisons. While XFS uses the usage bits *in the rmap records* for cross-referencing metadata in xfs_scrub and xfs_repair, it only needs the owner and offset information to distinguish between reverse mappings of the same physical extent into the data fork of a file at multiple offsets. The other bits are not important for key comparisons for index lookups, and never have been. Eric Sandeen reports that this causes regressions in generic/299, so undo this patch before it does more damage. Reported-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> Fixes: 6ff646b2ceb0 ("xfs: fix rmap key and record comparison functions") Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c index 577a66381327c..beb81c84a9375 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c @@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ xfs_rmapbt_key_diff( else if (y > x) return -1; - x = be64_to_cpu(kp->rm_offset); - y = xfs_rmap_irec_offset_pack(rec); + x = XFS_RMAP_OFF(be64_to_cpu(kp->rm_offset)); + y = rec->rm_offset; if (x > y) return 1; else if (y > x) @@ -275,8 +275,8 @@ xfs_rmapbt_diff_two_keys( else if (y > x) return -1; - x = be64_to_cpu(kp1->rm_offset); - y = be64_to_cpu(kp2->rm_offset); + x = XFS_RMAP_OFF(be64_to_cpu(kp1->rm_offset)); + y = XFS_RMAP_OFF(be64_to_cpu(kp2->rm_offset)); if (x > y) return 1; else if (y > x) @@ -390,8 +390,8 @@ xfs_rmapbt_keys_inorder( return 1; else if (a > b) return 0; - a = be64_to_cpu(k1->rmap.rm_offset); - b = be64_to_cpu(k2->rmap.rm_offset); + a = XFS_RMAP_OFF(be64_to_cpu(k1->rmap.rm_offset)); + b = XFS_RMAP_OFF(be64_to_cpu(k2->rmap.rm_offset)); if (a <= b) return 1; return 0; @@ -420,8 +420,8 @@ xfs_rmapbt_recs_inorder( return 1; else if (a > b) return 0; - a = be64_to_cpu(r1->rmap.rm_offset); - b = be64_to_cpu(r2->rmap.rm_offset); + a = XFS_RMAP_OFF(be64_to_cpu(r1->rmap.rm_offset)); + b = XFS_RMAP_OFF(be64_to_cpu(r2->rmap.rm_offset)); if (a <= b) return 1; return 0;