Patch "reiserfs: only call unlock_new_inode() if I_NEW" has been added to the 5.8-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    reiserfs: only call unlock_new_inode() if I_NEW

to the 5.8-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     reiserfs-only-call-unlock_new_inode-if-i_new.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.8 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit 301a836c3f5d8365c7c33104fde159dd4b0fc6dd
Author: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Sun Jun 28 00:00:57 2020 -0700

    reiserfs: only call unlock_new_inode() if I_NEW
    
    [ Upstream commit 8859bf2b1278d064a139e3031451524a49a56bd0 ]
    
    unlock_new_inode() is only meant to be called after a new inode has
    already been inserted into the hash table.  But reiserfs_new_inode() can
    call it even before it has inserted the inode, triggering the WARNING in
    unlock_new_inode().  Fix this by only calling unlock_new_inode() if the
    inode has the I_NEW flag set, indicating that it's in the table.
    
    This addresses the syzbot report "WARNING in unlock_new_inode"
    (https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=187510916eb6a14598f7).
    
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200628070057.820213-1-ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx
    Reported-by: syzbot+187510916eb6a14598f7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
index e43fed96704d8..c76d563dec0e1 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
@@ -2159,7 +2159,8 @@ int reiserfs_new_inode(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th,
 out_inserted_sd:
 	clear_nlink(inode);
 	th->t_trans_id = 0;	/* so the caller can't use this handle later */
-	unlock_new_inode(inode); /* OK to do even if we hadn't locked it */
+	if (inode->i_state & I_NEW)
+		unlock_new_inode(inode);
 	iput(inode);
 	return err;
 }



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux