This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled [PATCH stable 5.9 29/30] net: openvswitch: fix to make sure flow_lookup() is not preempted to the 5.9-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: net-openvswitch-fix-to-make-sure-flow_lookup-is-not-preempted.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.9 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From foo@baz Sat Oct 24 10:56:06 AM CEST 2020 From: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 20:24:51 +0200 Subject: [PATCH stable 5.9 29/30] net: openvswitch: fix to make sure flow_lookup() is not preempted From: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit f981fc3d515a588c389242b7e3a71487b40571a5 ] The flow_lookup() function uses per CPU variables, which must be called with BH disabled. However, this is fine in the general NAPI use case where the local BH is disabled. But, it's also called from the netlink context. The below patch makes sure that even in the netlink path, the BH is disabled. In addition, u64_stats_update_begin() requires a lock to ensure one writer which is not ensured here. Making it per-CPU and disabling NAPI (softirq) ensures that there is always only one writer. Fixes: eac87c413bf9 ("net: openvswitch: reorder masks array based on usage") Reported-by: Juri Lelli <jlelli@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@xxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/160295903253.7789.826736662555102345.stgit@ebuild Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/openvswitch/flow_table.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ net/openvswitch/flow_table.h | 8 ++++- 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) --- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c +++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static struct table_instance *table_inst static void __mask_array_destroy(struct mask_array *ma) { - free_percpu(ma->masks_usage_cntr); + free_percpu(ma->masks_usage_stats); kfree(ma); } @@ -196,15 +196,15 @@ static void tbl_mask_array_reset_counter ma->masks_usage_zero_cntr[i] = 0; for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { - u64 *usage_counters = per_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_cntr, - cpu); + struct mask_array_stats *stats; unsigned int start; u64 counter; + stats = per_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_stats, cpu); do { - start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&ma->syncp); - counter = usage_counters[i]; - } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&ma->syncp, start)); + start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&stats->syncp); + counter = stats->usage_cntrs[i]; + } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&stats->syncp, start)); ma->masks_usage_zero_cntr[i] += counter; } @@ -227,9 +227,10 @@ static struct mask_array *tbl_mask_array sizeof(struct sw_flow_mask *) * size); - new->masks_usage_cntr = __alloc_percpu(sizeof(u64) * size, - __alignof__(u64)); - if (!new->masks_usage_cntr) { + new->masks_usage_stats = __alloc_percpu(sizeof(struct mask_array_stats) + + sizeof(u64) * size, + __alignof__(u64)); + if (!new->masks_usage_stats) { kfree(new); return NULL; } @@ -723,6 +724,8 @@ static struct sw_flow *masked_flow_looku /* Flow lookup does full lookup on flow table. It starts with * mask from index passed in *index. + * This function MUST be called with BH disabled due to the use + * of CPU specific variables. */ static struct sw_flow *flow_lookup(struct flow_table *tbl, struct table_instance *ti, @@ -732,7 +735,7 @@ static struct sw_flow *flow_lookup(struc u32 *n_cache_hit, u32 *index) { - u64 *usage_counters = this_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_cntr); + struct mask_array_stats *stats = this_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_stats); struct sw_flow *flow; struct sw_flow_mask *mask; int i; @@ -742,9 +745,9 @@ static struct sw_flow *flow_lookup(struc if (mask) { flow = masked_flow_lookup(ti, key, mask, n_mask_hit); if (flow) { - u64_stats_update_begin(&ma->syncp); - usage_counters[*index]++; - u64_stats_update_end(&ma->syncp); + u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->syncp); + stats->usage_cntrs[*index]++; + u64_stats_update_end(&stats->syncp); (*n_cache_hit)++; return flow; } @@ -763,9 +766,9 @@ static struct sw_flow *flow_lookup(struc flow = masked_flow_lookup(ti, key, mask, n_mask_hit); if (flow) { /* Found */ *index = i; - u64_stats_update_begin(&ma->syncp); - usage_counters[*index]++; - u64_stats_update_end(&ma->syncp); + u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->syncp); + stats->usage_cntrs[*index]++; + u64_stats_update_end(&stats->syncp); return flow; } } @@ -851,9 +854,17 @@ struct sw_flow *ovs_flow_tbl_lookup(stru struct mask_array *ma = rcu_dereference_ovsl(tbl->mask_array); u32 __always_unused n_mask_hit; u32 __always_unused n_cache_hit; + struct sw_flow *flow; u32 index = 0; - return flow_lookup(tbl, ti, ma, key, &n_mask_hit, &n_cache_hit, &index); + /* This function gets called trough the netlink interface and therefore + * is preemptible. However, flow_lookup() function needs to be called + * with BH disabled due to CPU specific variables. + */ + local_bh_disable(); + flow = flow_lookup(tbl, ti, ma, key, &n_mask_hit, &n_cache_hit, &index); + local_bh_enable(); + return flow; } struct sw_flow *ovs_flow_tbl_lookup_exact(struct flow_table *tbl, @@ -1109,7 +1120,6 @@ void ovs_flow_masks_rebalance(struct flo for (i = 0; i < ma->max; i++) { struct sw_flow_mask *mask; - unsigned int start; int cpu; mask = rcu_dereference_ovsl(ma->masks[i]); @@ -1120,14 +1130,16 @@ void ovs_flow_masks_rebalance(struct flo masks_and_count[i].counter = 0; for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { - u64 *usage_counters = per_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_cntr, - cpu); + struct mask_array_stats *stats; + unsigned int start; u64 counter; + stats = per_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_stats, cpu); do { - start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&ma->syncp); - counter = usage_counters[i]; - } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&ma->syncp, start)); + start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&stats->syncp); + counter = stats->usage_cntrs[i]; + } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&stats->syncp, + start)); masks_and_count[i].counter += counter; } --- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.h +++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.h @@ -38,12 +38,16 @@ struct mask_count { u64 counter; }; +struct mask_array_stats { + struct u64_stats_sync syncp; + u64 usage_cntrs[]; +}; + struct mask_array { struct rcu_head rcu; int count, max; - u64 __percpu *masks_usage_cntr; + struct mask_array_stats __percpu *masks_usage_stats; u64 *masks_usage_zero_cntr; - struct u64_stats_sync syncp; struct sw_flow_mask __rcu *masks[]; }; Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from echaudro@xxxxxxxxxx are queue-5.9/net-openvswitch-fix-to-make-sure-flow_lookup-is-not-preempted.patch