This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled s390/ptrace: fix setting syscall number to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: s390-ptrace-fix-setting-syscall-number.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. commit e0490cf821baf685be8e9cdb75898a1c3b072d4c Author: Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon Mar 9 16:44:50 2020 +0100 s390/ptrace: fix setting syscall number [ Upstream commit 873e5a763d604c32988c4a78913a8dab3862d2f9 ] When strace wants to update the syscall number, it sets GPR2 to the desired number and updates the GPR via PTRACE_SETREGSET. It doesn't update regs->int_code which would cause the old syscall executed on syscall restart. As we cannot change the ptrace ABI and don't have a field for the interruption code, check whether the tracee is in a syscall and the last instruction was svc. In that case assume that the tracer wants to update the syscall number and copy the GPR2 value to regs->int_code. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c index fc2974b929c37..ee757d6f585e6 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -308,6 +308,25 @@ static inline void __poke_user_per(struct task_struct *child, child->thread.per_user.end = data; } +static void fixup_int_code(struct task_struct *child, addr_t data) +{ + struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(child); + int ilc = regs->int_code >> 16; + u16 insn; + + if (ilc > 6) + return; + + if (ptrace_access_vm(child, regs->psw.addr - (regs->int_code >> 16), + &insn, sizeof(insn), FOLL_FORCE) != sizeof(insn)) + return; + + /* double check that tracee stopped on svc instruction */ + if ((insn >> 8) != 0xa) + return; + + regs->int_code = 0x20000 | (data & 0xffff); +} /* * Write a word to the user area of a process at location addr. This * operation does have an additional problem compared to peek_user. @@ -319,7 +338,9 @@ static int __poke_user(struct task_struct *child, addr_t addr, addr_t data) struct user *dummy = NULL; addr_t offset; + if (addr < (addr_t) &dummy->regs.acrs) { + struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(child); /* * psw and gprs are stored on the stack */ @@ -337,7 +358,11 @@ static int __poke_user(struct task_struct *child, addr_t addr, addr_t data) /* Invalid addressing mode bits */ return -EINVAL; } - *(addr_t *)((addr_t) &task_pt_regs(child)->psw + addr) = data; + + if (test_pt_regs_flag(regs, PIF_SYSCALL) && + addr == offsetof(struct user, regs.gprs[2])) + fixup_int_code(child, data); + *(addr_t *)((addr_t) ®s->psw + addr) = data; } else if (addr < (addr_t) (&dummy->regs.orig_gpr2)) { /* @@ -703,6 +728,10 @@ static int __poke_user_compat(struct task_struct *child, regs->psw.mask = (regs->psw.mask & ~PSW_MASK_BA) | (__u64)(tmp & PSW32_ADDR_AMODE); } else { + + if (test_pt_regs_flag(regs, PIF_SYSCALL) && + addr == offsetof(struct compat_user, regs.gprs[2])) + fixup_int_code(child, data); /* gpr 0-15 */ *(__u32*)((addr_t) ®s->psw + addr*2 + 4) = tmp; }