This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled dccp: limit sk_filter trim to payload to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: dccp-limit-sk_filter-trim-to-payload.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From 4f0c40d94461cfd23893a17335b2ab78ecb333c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 18:18:57 -0400 Subject: dccp: limit sk_filter trim to payload From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx> commit 4f0c40d94461cfd23893a17335b2ab78ecb333c8 upstream. Dccp verifies packet integrity, including length, at initial rcv in dccp_invalid_packet, later pulls headers in dccp_enqueue_skb. A call to sk_filter in-between can cause __skb_pull to wrap skb->len. skb_copy_datagram_msg interprets this as a negative value, so (correctly) fails with EFAULT. The negative length is reported in ioctl SIOCINQ or possibly in a DCCP_WARN in dccp_close. Introduce an sk_receive_skb variant that caps how small a filter program can trim packets, and call this in dccp with the header length. Excessively trimmed packets are now processed normally and queued for reception as 0B payloads. Fixes: 7c657876b63c ("[DCCP]: Initial implementation") Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- include/net/sock.h | 8 +++++++- net/core/sock.c | 7 ++++--- net/dccp/ipv4.c | 2 +- net/dccp/ipv6.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/include/net/sock.h +++ b/include/net/sock.h @@ -1651,7 +1651,13 @@ static inline void sock_put(struct sock */ void sock_gen_put(struct sock *sk); -int sk_receive_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, const int nested); +int __sk_receive_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, const int nested, + unsigned int trim_cap); +static inline int sk_receive_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, + const int nested) +{ + return __sk_receive_skb(sk, skb, nested, 1); +} static inline void sk_tx_queue_set(struct sock *sk, int tx_queue) { --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -484,11 +484,12 @@ int sock_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_queue_rcv_skb); -int sk_receive_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, const int nested) +int __sk_receive_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, + const int nested, unsigned int trim_cap) { int rc = NET_RX_SUCCESS; - if (sk_filter(sk, skb)) + if (sk_filter_trim_cap(sk, skb, trim_cap)) goto discard_and_relse; skb->dev = NULL; @@ -524,7 +525,7 @@ discard_and_relse: kfree_skb(skb); goto out; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_receive_skb); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sk_receive_skb); struct dst_entry *__sk_dst_check(struct sock *sk, u32 cookie) { --- a/net/dccp/ipv4.c +++ b/net/dccp/ipv4.c @@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ lookup: goto discard_and_relse; nf_reset(skb); - return sk_receive_skb(sk, skb, 1); + return __sk_receive_skb(sk, skb, 1, dh->dccph_doff * 4); no_dccp_socket: if (!xfrm4_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb)) --- a/net/dccp/ipv6.c +++ b/net/dccp/ipv6.c @@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ lookup: if (!xfrm6_policy_check(sk, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb)) goto discard_and_relse; - return sk_receive_skb(sk, skb, 1) ? -1 : 0; + return __sk_receive_skb(sk, skb, 1, dh->dccph_doff * 4) ? -1 : 0; no_dccp_socket: if (!xfrm6_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb)) Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from willemb@xxxxxxxxxx are queue-4.4/dccp-limit-sk_filter-trim-to-payload.patch