On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 05:36:58PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > * gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2020-01-01 17:26:59]: > > Hi Greg, > > > > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > > > Revert "powerpc/vcpu: Assume dedicated processors as non-preempt" > > > > to the 4.19-stable tree which can be found at: > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary > > > > The filename of the patch is: > > revert-powerpc-vcpu-assume-dedicated-processors-as-non-preempt.patch > > and it can be found in the queue-4.19 subdirectory. > > > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, > > please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. > > > > Commit 6da3eced8c5f ("powerpc/spinlocks: Include correct header for static > key") which fixes a build problem with CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=n that led to the > revert of powerpc/vcpu: Assume dedicated processors as non-preempt" is now > part of mainline. > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=6da3eced8c5f3b03340b0c395bacd552c4d52411 > > Hence can we please have upstream commit 14c73bd344da60abaf7da3ea2e7733ddda35bbac. > back in stable tree? So you only need 14c73bd344da ("powerpc/vcpu: Assume dedicated processors as non-preempt") in the tree, and nothing else? Or do you also want 6da3eced8c5f? thanks, greg k-h
