Re: Thanks and Suggestions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Chris Mirchandani <novashadow@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> OK you will likely be able to tell I am a newb when it comes to mailing lists, so please forgive me if I have sent this to the wrong place or have used the wrong format. While i do not know how likely a dev will read this, maybe someone closer can pass this along.
>
> I have been using ssh for a while and recently discovered how ssh is so much more. I have appreciated how programs like scp, sftp and rsync use ssh for authentication and security and then I have played a little with ssh-fs. However, now I have discovered things like local and reverse forwarding, dynamic socks forwarding, tunneling, etc. and all I can say is WOW! So all  can say is things to the devs and all of you that have helped make ssh all that it is. It's feature rich, stable and secure. I do have a couple of suggestions and some questions.
>
> Suggestions
>
> 1) Add an option for Reverse dynamic forwards.
>
> 2) Add more options for the GatewayPorts settings in the sshd_config file. Currently, no, clientspecified and yes are the only options. I think there should be a yes option, that allows the client to specify localhost only. This would allow the client to force localhost only even when the gatewayport settings is to a version of yes that would normally allow on all addresses.
>
> 2a) Maybe this should be 2 options to cover if the client requests multiple bind addresses and the gatewayports option is ones of these new versions of yes. It would only open localhost if the client specified just localhost or localhost + multiple other bind addresses. The other would open up only localhost if the client specified only localhost, but open all addresses if the client specified local host + multiple other bind addresses. If the client did not specify localhost, all addresses would be open with either option.
>
> 2b) I would like to see a 2nd clientspecified option. One that only opens all addresses if the client specifically requests it. I am not sure if the ssh client currently specifies all or 0.0.0.0 if I do not specify a bind address or if it just leaves that field blank. If it's blank, this is easy, if the new clientspecified option is set and the bind address field is empty, it only opens the forward to localhost. If the bind address feild cannot be blank, I am not sure what can be done to maintain compatibility unless the ssh client is already using a bind address term not used by end users, meaning not all or 0.0.0.0.
>
> 2c) It would also be nice if in the GatewayPorts, I could set specific bind addresses.
>
> 2d) There should be an equivalent of these options for the client side to ignore or cancel the forward if the bind ports are not what it wants. e.g. The client could specify all ports and if the server forces this to localhost, the end user could set an option to cancel the forward in that case. If the end user sets multiple binds, he/she could specify absolutes, so that if all the ones marked absolute are not allowed, the forward is canceled. Also, the client should be able to set an if more than these addresses are allowed option so that if more than the requested addresses are allowed, the forward is canceled. Both options should be able to be used at the same time and the latter should only have to be used on one of the forward options for it to apply to all of them.
>
> 3) Maybe this already exits, so maybe this is not a request. Would like an easy to use command that lets us see all the forwards and tunnels on a computer. I should be able to limit to one or multiple types, local, remote, dynamic, remote dynamic (if my request is added), tunnels initiated locally and tunnels initiated remotely. Should be options for all forwards only, all tunnels only everything and if you could use the inclusive options and exclude ones you do not want in the list. It would be great if I could set a specific log just for this and so that ever time thius changes it updates that log with the change or all the connections with the changes highlighted. e.g. added in front of each that was added and removed for those that were closed. No, gSTM (http://sourceforge.net/projects/gstm/) is not an alternative for what I am suggesting.
>
> 4) Command that can show all ssh connections, remote and local.
>
> Question
>
> Is there a way to send a command via ssh that stays open even if the the ssh session that created it closes? I have this figured out already, I think, but my problem is that my ssh session does not close like it normally does after a command is run and completed. So maybe my real question is, how do I do this and have the ssh session close after the command is run? e.g. If I run the following command, I get output and the ssh command closes. Of course the command I am running in this example, has an end, but the one I want to use does not.
>
> ssh -p 4731 root@localhost netstat -an | egrep "tcp.*:3731.*LISTEN"
>
> However, if  run one of the following commands, the remote command works, but  am not returned to the command prompt. I have to kill the ssh connection to be returned to a prompt and the remote command stays running after I kill the initial connection, but this does not help me in a script.
>
> $ ssh -p 4731 root@localhost 'ssh -q -N -D 1873 -p 3731 sshd@localhost &'
> $ ssh -p 4731 root@localhost ssh -q -N -f -D 1873 -p 3731 sshd@localhost
>
> Btw, the fact that I am using localhost does not mean that all connections are to the same computer. The ports are forwards. I know I can send the local command to the background, but there is no need to keep it open, i want to to close like it does with ssh -p 4731 root@localhost netstat -an | egrep "tcp.*:3731.*LISTEN".

Use the "lsof" on the remote server and you can see that STDIN
,STDOUT, STDERR are being used from the newly started daemon process
on the remote side (in your case sshd). So, your ssh client will not
exit till this daemon is stopped. So, redirect these descriptors to
/dev/null to exit immediately.

Regards,
Bala

>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live™ Hotmail®:…more than just e-mail.
> http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_hm_justgotbetter_explore_022009


[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Unix Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux