On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Paul Lesniewski <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> > This patch renders my server inoperable. It drives the load from 2.57 >> > avg. up to 121 (!) in a few minutes. >> >> Huh. Obviously more analysis is needed. Are you absolutely sure this >> was the only thing you changed before the load skyrocketed? > > Yes. I applied the patch - and the load rose. I "patch -R"-ed the > patch, all back to normal. > >> If it caused this kind of load, it seems like you would have noticed a >> part of the software that became noticeably slower -- did you or your >> users notice anything like that? > > SM completely ceased to work. I don't understand that. You said it seemed to fix the issue. SM *works* for me with the patch, so it's not that it doesn't work. I'm looking for what actions become problematic... -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ----- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines List address: squirrelmail-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
