On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:23 PM, David C. Rankin <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> >> No one else has reported this issue, it works for the rest of us >> apparently, so there is no reason to think that the code would >> magically change just for you without you telling us what the problem >> is. > > Oh contrare.... Add +1 to the list. See my separate post with wireshark packets. I don't appreciate the blameful tone of this email, not to mention that it is flat-out wrong: at the time I wrote that it was very much the case that, AFAIK, no one had reported the issue. Moreover, this issue is entirely unrelated to the one you reported on another thread. You didn't even bother to read this thread and then make a statement like this to people you expect to spend their free time to provide you software and give you free help. No thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ ----- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines List address: squirrelmail-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
