> >> On 10/01/24 12:18, Miha Miha wrote: > >>> Release note of latest Squid 6.6 says: "...not deemed ready for > >>> production use..." For comparison Squid 5.1 was 'ready'. When v6 is > >>> expected to be ready for prod systems? > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 3:37 PM Amos Jeffries wrote: > >> Sorry, that is an oversight in the release notes text. Removing it now. > >> > >> Squid 6 is production ready. > > > > On 1/02/24 11:22, Miha Miha wrote: > > Hi Amos, > > I still see the 6.6 release note unchanged. Could you please adjust. > > >On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 6:50 AM Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The page is auto-generated from the release source code. It is too late > to change the 6.6 package. The documentation has been updated already > for 6.7 release. > > Cheers > Amos Hi Amos, FYI new release note still says: "...release of Squid-6.7 for testing." Sorry for being so punctual, Mihail On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 6:50 AM Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 1/02/24 11:22, Miha Miha wrote: > >> On 10/01/24 12:18, Miha Miha wrote: > >>> Release note of latest Squid 6.6 says: "...not deemed ready for > >>> production use..." For comparison Squid 5.1 was 'ready'. When v6 is > >>> expected to be ready for prod systems? > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 3:37 PM Amos Jeffries wrote: > >> Sorry, that is an oversight in the release notes text. Removing it now. > >> > >> Squid 6 is production ready. > > > > Hi Amos, > > I still see the 6.6 release note unchanged. Could you please adjust. > > > > > The page is auto-generated from the release source code. It is too late > to change the 6.6 package. The documentation has been updated already > for 6.7 release. > > Cheers > Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
