On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 02:55:54AM +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 21/01/2023 4:02 am, Athos Ribeiro wrote:
Hi! I am trying to understand how accurate the discussion in
http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-dev/2015-March/001853.html
is nowadays,
That discussion was the latest on Squid numbering. There have been
modifications to release timing, but the numbering still follows that
plan.
so I can understand the guides in
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/DeveloperResources/ReleaseProcess regarding
the release process.
Feature changes should be proposed against the "master" branch in our
github. If/when accepted they become part of the next Squid-N release
series. Which are now on a
<https://wiki.squid-cache.org/ReleaseSchedule>.
Point releases within a series should only contain documentation
corrections, bug and security vulnerability fixes. Exception may occur
at the release maintainers choice.
What I am interested in understanding is if there is a hard commitment
on the backwards compatibility between point releases since 4.x.
In other words, is there any commitment for no feature changes between
5.x and 5.(x+1)?
Yes. Feature changes should only occur between Squid-(N).x and
Squid-(N+m).x with non-0 'm'.
HTH
It does. Thanks, Amos!
Amos
--
Athos Ribeiro
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
