On 2/24/22 16:49, Dave Blanchard wrote:
This tutorial situation is really out of control. Sadly, this is what can be expected to happen when the syntax is changed with every version. Now we're in a real mess. I hope the Squid developers will make up their minds on how they want the syntax to be structured, build it that way, then LEAVE IT ALONE!
I do not know what tutorial(s) you are talking about, but ssl_bump syntax and the underlying principles have not changed for many years. The changing syntax is definitely not the problem. Squid bugs, lack of official tutorials, and TLS complexities/changes are.
SslBump is not compatible with a natural human desire to cut-and-paste examples from the first place they can find and see whether those examples "work" (multiplied by another human desire to publish their thoughts/results, regardless of the author level of expertise).
Can we publish an authoritative high-quality tutorial on SslBump? Sure! Unfortunately, the current lack of Project resources multiplied by chronic Project deficiencies do not leave us enough time to do that.
Alex. _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
