Thanks! An other, maybe easier way were to support more then one adaptation_access lines, so we could do something like this: adaptation_access pool1 allow all adaptation_access pool2 allow all But this is currently not working, only the first line takes effect, the second is ignored. The config reference says here: It is currently not possible to apply more than one adaptation service at the same vectoring point to the same HTTP transaction. What a shame :) Klaus Am Sonntag, den 04.04.2021, 23:29 -0400 schrieb Alex Rousskov: > On 3/31/21 10:02 AM, Klaus Brandl wrote: > > > is there a way to use more adaptation sets(for redundancy) combined > > in > > an adaptation chain? > > Squid only supports chains of services and sets of services. There is > currently no support for nesting (e.g., chains of sets). Such support > would be generally useful IMO. > > https://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/AboutSquid#How_to_add_a_new_Squid_feature.2C_enhance.2C_of_fix_something.3F > > Alex. > > > > What we need is something like this: > > > > icap_service b1 reqmod_precache ... > > icap_service b2 reqmod_precache ... > > icap_service b3 reqmod_precache ... > > icap_service b4 reqmod_precache ... > > > > icap_service m1 reqmod_precache ... > > icap_service m2 reqmod_precache ... > > icap_service m3 reqmod_precache ... > > icap_service m4 reqmod_precache ... > > > > #blacklist > > adaptation_service_set pool1 b1 b2 b3 b4 > > #malware scanner > > adaptation_service_set pool2 m1 m2 m3 m4 > > > > adaptation_service_chain checks pool1 pool2 > > > > adaptation_access checks allow all > > > > Regards > > > > Klaus _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
