On 7/28/20 5:38 AM, amaury@xxxxxx wrote: > thank for your suggestion. That specific suggestion was not mine :-) For free Squid support, please keep the conversation on squid-users. > I have tried with: > acl noTransactionLvs src 10.xxx.xxx.xxx/32 > acl noTransactionLvs src 10.xxx.xxx.xxx/32 > > acl hasRequest has request > acl dontLog all-of !hasRequest noTransactionLvs > access_log none dontLog > and with > acl noTransactionLvs src 10.xxx.xxx.xxx/32 > acl noTransactionLvs src 10.xxx.xxx.xxx/32 > > access_log none noTransactionLvs > access_log /var/log/squid4/access.log combined !noTransactionLvs > but without result. What is your Squid version? None of the configs below is the right long-term solution, but just for testing purposes, please try these three tests: * Test 1 (should log nothing): access_log none all # and no other access_log lines * Test 2 (should also log nothing): acl hasRequest has request access_log none !hasRequest access_log /var/log/squid4/access.log combined # and no other access_log lines * Test 3 (should only log regular transactions): acl hasRequest has request access_log none !hasRequest access_log /var/log/squid4/access.log combined # and no other access_log lines For each of the tests, please report whether regular transactions are logged to /var/log/squid4/access.log _and_ whether the loadbalancer probes are logged to /var/log/squid4/access.log Thank you, Alex. > ----Messaggio originale---- > Da: rousskov@measurement- > factory.com > Data: 27-lug-2020 15.19 > A: "amaury@xxxxxx"<amaury@xxxxxx>, > <squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Ogg: Re: filter > NONE/000 NONE error:transaction-end-before-headers > > On 7/27/20 6:30 AM, > amaury@xxxxxx wrote: > >> I would like to filter the message NONE/000 > NONE error: >> transaction-end-before-headers - HIER_NONE/- - - HTTP/0.0 > "-" 0 0 that >> it arrives from loadbalancer keep alived. > > >> I have > red that It was/is a bug. > > Those records are not a bug if your > loadbalancer does open connections > to Squid's http_port. > > >> Please > could you give me a >> practical example example that how it works the: > >> # acl aclname note [-m[=delimiters]] name [value ...] ? > > The "note" > ACL tests prior annotations. It is unlikely to help in your > use case > because nothing will be able to annotate these half-baked > short-lived > transactions until they are logged. > > Please see whether Amos' recent > suggestion works for you: > > http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/2020-July/022461.html > > > HTH, > > Alex. > > _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
