On 7/04/20 3:49 am, Alex Rousskov wrote: > On 4/4/20 8:02 PM, zrm wrote: >> Attached cache.log excerpt for wget-wget-apt-apt-wget-wget. It answers >> the apt requests from the cache once it's in there, it just won't cache >> it to begin with when apt makes the request > > Thank you for sharing this log. I agree with your conclusion. The apt > query results in cache revalidation and does not purge the already > cached copy. This conclusion eliminates a few suspects. > > There is probably something special about the combination of an apt > request and a 200 OK miss response that prevents Squid from caching that > response. I do not see anything wrong in the logs you have already > already posted. Perhaps others will spot something. zrm, can you please do a clean test for the apt sequence exactly as Alex requested rather than just referring to the earlier one done. A swapout timing overlap by as much as a few nanoseconds in the original test could mean the different between HIT and MISS. So anyone able to find this will need those details to work with. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
