Hi Alex thanks for info . so i can confirm 100 % its a bug bec same config exactly work on 3.5 if you recommend me any thing 4.x that work with delay pools or 5.x i would be thankful ! and thank you very much when you answered me about SMP and delay pools . all is clear , Looking forward to hearing that bug fixed . Thanks a lot . > On Sep 22, 2019, at 5:07 PM, Alex Rousskov <rousskov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 9/22/19 6:25 AM, --Ahmad-- wrote: > >> i tested squid 4.8 and delay pools not working with it at all . >> i reverted back to squid 3.5.x and i had delay pools working . > >> Q1- do squid 4 support delay pools ? > > It should. If it does not, there is a bug somewhere. > > >> Q2- with squid 3.5.x we have SMP about 4 childs , and we are running delay pools . >> does that mean speed ( with all 4 instances ) is 1/1 Mbps >> or speed ( with all 4 instances ) is 4/4 Mbps? > > According to [1], delay pools are not SMP-aware yet so you are > essentially configuring individual worker limits: Workers do not share > their limits and pools with each other. Hence, the effective Squid > instance limit is, very approximately, the aggregate of those configured > individual worker limits. For example, if each worker is limited by > 1Mbps, then the 4-worker instance may produce up to 4Mbps traffic. > > In reality, since individual workers usually receive different amounts > of traffic (especially until [2] is unblocked), the effective instance > limit will be more than 1Mbps and less than 4Mbps. > > [1] https://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SmpScale#What_can_workers_share.3F > > [2] https://github.com/squid-cache/squid/pull/369 > > Alex. > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
