On 4/1/19 3:17 AM, David Touzeau wrote: > On 30.03.19 10:22, David Touzeau wrote: >> * Debian 9 net install + Squid compiled >> * CentOS 7 minimal + Squid compiled >> >> Same version, same compilation parameters, same Squid settings. >> It seems that Squid on CentOS is 10 times faster than squid on Debian > We have recompiled same squid version on 2 systems > > No march= using --disable-arch-native on both systems > > Debian config.log > https://github.com/dtouzeau/1.6.x/blob/Tempfiles/debian9-config.log?raw=true > > Centos config.log > https://github.com/dtouzeau/1.6.x/blob/Tempfiles/centos7-config.log?raw=true > > Result was CentOS 44% faster on TCP_MEM_HITS Just to clarify: Did changing ./configure options alone move you from 1000% to 44%? Or was the earlier "10 times" just a crude approximation that we should ignore now? Do your Squids use shared memory for the memory cache? See memory_cache_shared (even if you do not set it explicitly). http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/memory_cache_shared/ Any significant difference in mgr:info and mgr:counters output after a test that only has memory hits? Alex. _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
