On 17/10/18 8:28 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
Very true, but based on my interpretation of browser makers' feedback on the HTTP WG mailing list, I doubt that will happen in the foreseeable future: Adding a proxy "security context" (in addition to the existing "insecure" and "origin" contexts) is not a priority for them, especially since it is only required to accommodate the needs of hated proxies.
While I slightly disagree with you for certain things but I also understand the reasons that you have explained behind it. So I will leave it at that. Thank you very much for elaborate replies. Amish. _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
