On 7/09/18 4:53 AM, Julian Perconti wrote: >> De: squid-users <squid-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> En nombre de >> Amos Jeffries >> Enviado el: jueves, 6 de septiembre de 2018 09:57 >> Para: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Asunto: Re: Squid and DNS >> >> On 6/09/18 7:22 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>> On 06.09.18 02:40, Julian Perconti wrote: >>> >>>> Is mandatory for squid to use only 1 dns/caching nameserver? >>> >>> usually, people have multiple DNS servers configured to fail over in >>> case one of them fails. >>> in some cases, client can balance the load, or prefer server with >>> faster responses. >>> >>> There should be no problem of this kind, unless one of your DNS >>> servers is broken. >>> >> >> If it wasn't clear already, yes Squid can use multiple resolvers BUT they need >> to be recursive resolvers and every one of them needs to be able to resolve >> *all* possible domains Squid will ask about. >> >> You cannot have one of them being authoritative for local domain names and >> another for public queries. DNS don't work like that. > > So squid can not use one resolver for a local and public domains/addresses and other or a second resolver to only public domains/ip? Both recursive resolvers. > Correct. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
