Tested with Squid-4.2 and ended with same results. How do we proceed here ? -----Original Message----- From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 9:14 PM To: Ahmad, Sarfaraz <Sarfaraz.Ahmad@xxxxxxxxxx>; squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Squid fails to bump where there are too many DNS names in SAN field On 09/04/2018 02:00 AM, Ahmad, Sarfaraz wrote: > 2018/09/04 12:45:46.112 kid1| 24,5| BinaryTokenizer.cc(47) want: 520 more bytes for Handshake.msg_body.octets occupying 16900 bytes @90 in 0xfa4d70; > 2018/09/04 12:45:46.112 kid1| 83,5| PeerConnector.cc(451) noteWantRead: local=10.240.180.31:43716 remote=103.243.13.183:443 FD 15 flags=1 Translation: Squid did not read enough data from the server to finish parsing TLS server handshake. Squid needs to read at least 520 more bytes from FD 15. > Later on after about 10 secs > 2018/09/04 12:45:58.124 kid1| 83,5| bio.cc(140) read: FD 12 read 0 <= 65535 And end-of-file on the wrong/different connection. My recommendations remain the same, but please follow Amos advice and upgrade to the latest v4 first. Please note that I do _not_ recommend analyzing ALL,9 logs. On average, such analysis by non-developers wastes more time than it saves. Alex. _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
