On 2/09/18 10:13 PM, David Touzeau wrote: > Thanks Amos, > > Yes my question was " if NAT is faster or slower than packet flow" and yes you are right. > > "Squid is not impacted to this question, this make sense." > > > I had a "feeling" (human sensation) - with 3.000 users that NAT was faster than Tproxy... > > But you confirm that this is not relevant... > It may be for you. That user count vs your bandwidth is more relevant than the features performance. For any given bandwidth total; NAT should cope better with higher user count, TPROXY should cope better with higher per-user consumption. So "best" is a matter of how those stack up on your specific network. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
