>When I looked at the code for Paolos report I found there to be a difference between SSL-Bumped and non-Bumped traffic. > >This hints to me that these opposite reports may due to how the traffic is being handled. > >So Julian, Paolo; if you don't mind can you please say whether you are using SSL-Bump in your tests and if so whether the test traffic got splice'd, bump'ed or no SSL-Bump feature use at all ? >From my side, the tests were done with full SSL-Bump; downloading a file from: https://speed.hetzner.de/ No splice. The delay cfg applies identically both to http/https protocols. >There might also still be bugs specific to pool types. We have had a few in the past that I'm not sure if ever got fixed. Though Paolo's mention that 3.5 worked okay hints that its probably not those >exact issues. Regards _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
