* Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 14/06/18 23:04, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > We're using squid 5.0.0-20180202-r51e09c0 and I recently realized that > > the values for "cacheHttpAllSvcTime" are quite high > > > > cacheHttpAllSvcTime.5 = 288 > > cacheHttpMissSvcTime.5 = 45 > > cacheHttpNmSvcTime.5 = 0 > > cacheHttpNhSvcTime.5 = 23 > > cacheHttpHitSvcTime.5 = 1 > > cacheIcpQuerySvcTime.5 = 0 > > cacheIcpReplySvcTime.5 = 0 > > cacheDnsSvcTime.5 = 30 > > > > Why is cacheHttpAllSvcTime so much higher than cacheHttpMissSvcTime.5 ? > > The proxy doesn't appear to be slow or sluggish. > > > > "All" includes things like CONNECT tunnels which can potentially have > very long duration and are no longer recorded under the "Miss" category. OK. This all started in January 2018 (probably while using 5.0.0-something) > IIRC they used to be combined, but with the growth of HTTPS usage we had > to separate so people could see if the non-tunnel MISS messages were > having latency problems. Makes perfect sense. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin ralf.hildebrandt@xxxxxxxxxx Campus Benjamin Franklin https://www.charite.de Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin Geschäftsbereich IT, Abt. Netzwerk fon: +49-30-450.570.155 _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
