On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thank you very much for the info .On 18/05/18 04:32, Panagiotis Bariamis wrote:
>> Hello ,
>> Only thing I have found concerning the subject is this 4 years old thread :
>>
>>>From: Amos Jeffries
>>>Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 14:46:09 +1200
>>>
>>>I have implemented Bearer authentication support in Squid and have found
>>>a noticible lack of support in clients for the 407 status Proxy-Auth*
>>>headers, even where Bearer support is advertized and working via 401
>>>status WWW-Auth*.
>>>
>>>Can any of the client implementers (Browsers in particular) please point
>>>out if they do support Bearer login to a proxy and what restrictions
>>>they have on it actually working?
>>>
>>>Amos Jeffries
>>>The Squid Software Foundation
>>>
>> Does anyone know if browsers have implemented since then support for
>> bearer authentication for Proxy-Auth ?
>>
>AFAIK the situation has not changed. Except that there are now several
>CDN providers using Bearer authentication in reverse-proxies.
>
>I have been keeping the auth-bearer branch up to date with Squid-5. So
>if you wish to try it out it should work okay (and safely). You will
>need to provide your own authentication helper to interface with
>whatever OAuth systems you use.
>Amos
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
