Thank you Amos for the feedback.
I did see an example online using ACL and that tricked me. On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:02 AM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 25/04/18 23:44, Alex K wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was using a squid (3.1.20) + squidguard setup (to filter out several
> site categories) on Debian 7 and the setup worked. The squidguard was
> invoked from squid.conf as below:
>
> redirect_program /usr/bin/squidGuard -c /etc/squidguard/squidGuard.conf There are no ACLs on the above line. So it cannot match anything. The
> redirect_children 7
>
> I am now testing the setup on Debian 9 (with squid 3.5.23) with the
> following lines in squid.conf:
>
> url_rewrite_access allow
implicit default applies instead. Implicit default after any "allow"
line is "deny all".
Also, you did not configure any allow/deny previously. So why add it now?
> url_rewrite_program /usr/bin/squidGuard -c /etc/squidguard/squidGuard.conf No traffic is allowed to go to the helper. So no SG processes necessary.
> url_rewrite_children 5
>
> But I get at squid logs:
>
> 2018/04/24 12:06:57 kid1| helperOpenServers: Starting 0/5 'squidGuard'
> processes
> 2018/04/24 12:06:57 kid1| helperOpenServers: No 'squidGuard' processes
> needed.
Squid is correct.
>
> Seems that squid is ignoring and not starting squidguard.
> I have read also some have mentioned that squidguard is not maintained
> anymore.
>
> Any idea on the above?> Any better alternative to squidguard that you recommend?
ufdbguard is much better than the outdated and no longer maintained
SquidGuard (but is not packaged on Debian).
Amos
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users