Le 14/03/2018 à 15:02, Yuri a écrit : > I can confirm - ufdbguard is up-to-date and very good customizable > replacement for SquidGuard. Using ufdbguard last three years gives > perfect results and bring functionality which is absent in > SquidGuard. > > ufdbguard has good support of https (including SSL Bump), incredible > fast (it is thread-aware) and has small memory footprint. Thanks everybody for your numerous suggestions. I fiddled around much more with Squid, and for the moment, I got my existing SquidGuard configuration from Slackware working on CentOS. https://blog.microlinux.fr/squidguard-centos/ As soon as I have a bit of time on my hands to experiment, I'll take a look at ufdbguard. For the moment, SquidGuard works perfectly here. Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr Mail : info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32 _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
