Thanks for the explanation.
Do you have any guide?
Em qua, 14 de mar de 2018 às 10:26, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
On 13.03.18 14:44, Danilo V wrote:
>I mean SSL bump in explicit mode.
>So intercept is a essencial requirement for running SSL bump?
No, you asked for "explicit mode with ssl intercept" which I pointed out is
illogical.
>Em ter, 13 de mar de 2018 às 11:10, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <
>uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
>> On 13.03.18 13:44, Danilo V wrote:
>> >Is it possible/feasible to configure squid in explicit mode with ssl
>> >intercept?
>>
>> maybe you mean SSL bump in explicit mode?
It is possible to bump explicit proxy.
>> >Due to architecture of my network it is not possible to implement
>> >transparent proxy.
>>
>> excuse me?
>> by "transparent" people mean what we usually call "intercept".
>> >What would be the behavior of applications that dont support proxy - i.e.
>> >dont forward requests to proxy?
>>
>> they mest be intercepted.
"must" be intercepted. Since you said that it's not possible transparent (I
believe you have meant intercepting) proxy, it's apparently not possible to
handle applications that do not support proxy.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
2B|!2B, that's a question!
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
