On 15/10/17 14:17, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
why not libssl-dev?
On 13.10.17 15:16, Marcus Kool wrote:
Debian 9 has openssl 1.1.x while most platforms have older versions.
On 16/10/17 23:47, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
that means, you should use libssl-dev unless you know squid
can't compile
with openssl-1.1
On 15.10.17 18:43, Marcus Kool wrote:
Openssl 1.1.x is not backwards compatible and does not have the symbol
CRYPTO_LOCK_X509 while openssl 1.0.2 has.
are you talking about squid or ufdbguard?
On 17.10.17 03:04, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Doesn't matter, it is a problem with OpenSSL 1.0 vs 1.1.
Anything which uses OpenSSL 1.0 specific symbols needs libssl1.0-dev
on Debian.
so, does squid reauire openssl-1.0?
ok, found finally:
https://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/CompilingSquid#Debian.2C_Ubuntu
However, please note that Squid-3.5 is not compatible with OpenSSL
v1.1+. As of Debian Squeeze, or Ubuntu Zesty the libssl1.0-dev
package must be used instead. This is resolved in the Squid-4
packages when they become available.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
