And it's still said softly - it's arrtacted to the ears. Speech, as I understand it, is about the insertion of advertising banners in the pages given to clients from the proxy (cache). What are the literary works and copyright? The insertion of advertising is money, and considerable. If op is to deduct a portion of the amount for advertising to site owners (content) - it seems to me that there will be no legal collision and there is no need to drag here a dead donkey - that is, forgive, the ancient laws of the early 20th century. It seems to me that the phrase "HTML can contain" (and may not contain, and in most cases does not contain - because the Web is bullshit in most cases) the above - it sounds extremely Jesuit. 02.10.2017 8:47, Amos Jeffries пишет: > On 02/10/17 02:33, B Hirsch wrote: >> Any legal references someone could point to? > > > > <http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/text.jsp?file_id=283698> > > "HTML" can contain almost any type of work, so it is hard to know in > advance exactly which of the clauses or exemptions apply. > > Amos > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Attachment:
0x3E3743A7.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
