On 26/09/17 08:56, Aaron Turner wrote:
So is v4 stable? I was the impression it was beta? That said, if v4 has better memory tuning options then I'm all ears.
Yes it is beta. Some bugs still to work out in the ssl-bump code, but that is all.
Overall the v4 ssl-bump code is far better behaved and capable than the 3.5 series - so it is probably worth using despite the remaining bugs *if* your current issues are not showing up there.
First thing I would do though is adding sslflags=NO_DEFAULT_CA to the http_port line(s). It reduces the memory needs a lot when bumping in v3.5.
Right now I'm fighting OOM errors (and the kernel OOM reaper) under sustained load. I've come to realize 6GB is way way too much for my 14GB RAM systems, but finding even 1GB is too much since each squid process is exceeding 4GB. About to try 500MB now. I can disable rock cache, but I need some disk cache- is there a better option?
Possibly a smaller rock cache, and a UFS/AUFS/diskd cache - rock can share disk with another cache, its just the UFS/* caches that do not share well with each other.
Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
