Search squid archive

Re: When the redirect [301, 302, 307] is cached by Squid?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21/09/17 20:36, kAja Ziegler wrote:
Hi Amos,

    302 and 307 are not because as their status description indicates
    they are *temporary* results. They can only be cached if there are
    explicit details from the server indicating for how long.


You were right. After I added header Cache-Control "max-age=60, must-revalidate" to the redirects, then the response was cached. Thank you for clarification.

    301 should be cached unless the object would need revalidation
    immediately.


But for 301 I always get MISS - with and without a cache-control header:

$ curl -v http:/test.example.com/img301.jpg <http://test.example.com/img301.jpg>

GET /img301.jpg HTTP/1.1
Host: test.example.com <http://test.example.com>
User-Agent: curl/7.50.1
Accept: */*

< HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
< Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 06:44:41 GMT
< Server: Apache
< Cache-Control: max-age=60, must-revalidate
< Location: http://test.example.com <http://test.example.com>/img.svg
< Content-Length: 247
< Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
< X-Cache: MISS from <squid-proxy>
< X-Cache-Lookup: MISS from <squid-proxy>:3128

I can't find any information on Squid wiki or via Google if the object need revalidation immediately.

Thats what the "must-revalidate" means. It should work better with just max-age or Expires header - and with a longer value than 60 sec since this is supposed to be a *permanent* situation.


Amos
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux