13.07.2017 5:13, bugreporter пишет: > Hi Antony, > > If they effectively don't *distribute* their modifications... But we don't > know. Thank you so much for the clarification. And in general, making such statements, you need to be ready to prove them in court. When you can prove that we are distributing software for commercial purposes with patches that are not given to the community, then you will throw such statements. Until this is proven - I suggest you apologize. > > Kind Regards, > > > > ----- > Bug Reporter Contributor > OpenSource = Open-Minded > -- > View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Chaining-icap-and-ecap-services-FATAL-Received-Segment-Violation-dying-tp4683033p4683087.html > Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
