On 07/07/17 03:41, Razor Cross wrote:
Hi Amos,
Do you have any insights on the below issue? Is it fixed on latest squid
release? Your inputs would be really helpful
If that means you consider me Squid "owner" or official spokesperson.
Well, I am one such, but so is Alex. If it helps
<http://wiki.squid-cache.org/WhoWeAre> lists the people most central to
Squid Project and what their roles are. I defer to Alex most of the time
when it comes to the internal cache/store operations since his Factory
team have done the most recent and extensive redesign work for that code.
As to the problem;
AFAIK Squid currently should not be caching these objects at all. Or
when it does use the disk cache as a temporary storage (eg for very
large objects) marking them for immediate discard when the abort
happens. That is being tracked by
<http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424>.
If that situation has changed and these objects are now being stored
incorrectly, that would be a new bug which is both a regression on the
old safe cache behaviour and blocking the 424 bug. I second Alexs' comments.
Amos
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
