Search squid archive

Re: Squid and SSLBump

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/06/17 06:01, Walter H. wrote:
On 09.06.2017 09:33, FredB wrote:
Hi all,

There is way to approximately estimate the "cost" of CPU/Memory usage of SSLbump ?
be careful, if there is a "cost" value now, this will be very probably wrong when SSL gets more common ...



As far as I have seen there are simply not enough published numbers for the SSL-Bump and HTTPS proxying to get even a good ballpark estimate yet. Additional info for the <http://wiki.squid-cache.org/KnowledgeBase/Benchmarks> page are welcome, how to take measurements to minimize comparison issues are listed there.

IMO, the situation is much the same with plain-text as well as Squid has constantly improving support for HTTP/1.1 and performance updates changing things there too. For any given machine you should be able to get your own numbers by comparing the RPS numbers to the CPU and memory load patterns, regardless of what the feature sets in use are.

Amos

_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux