On 05/16/2017 07:34 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > What I meant was that the patch that exists in the > Bugzilla(http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4332) can be > polished to be tested on 3.5.25 Ah, that is my patch so it does not need my review or original code writing. It needs updating and up-porting to Squid v5 (at least). I do not have free cycles for that work so the usual options apply: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/AboutSquid#How_to_add_a_new_Squid_feature.2C_enhance.2C_of_fix_something.3F Alex. > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Rousskov [mailto:rousskov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 4:58 AM > To: Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Experimental YouTube Caching helper\tool and SQUID 3.5.25 + 4.0.19 RPM's RELEASED > > On 05/15/2017 07:04 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > >> @Alex, What will encourage you to help with an improved patch to add ICAP >> X-StoreID (or else) response header capability > > A submission of a high-quality patch would encourage me to review it. > Unfortunately, I do not have the free cycles necessary for actually > writing code together if that is what you meant. > > Alex. > _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
