Re: Squid Transparent/intercept Issues

[Yuri Voinov <yvoinov@xxxxxxxxx>]

Did you tried our wiki:

http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept

?

20.03.2017 21:26, christian brendan пишет:

Hello Everyone,

Squid Cache: Version 3.5.20

OS: CentOS 7

I have used squid for quite some times non transparently and it works,

problem kicks in when: http_port 3128 transparent is enabled. 

Access denied error page shows up when transparent is enabled

ERROR

The requested URL could not be retrieved

---

The following error was encountered while trying to retrieve the URL: http://www.bing.com

Access Denied.

Access control configuration prevents your request from being allowed at this time. Please contact your service provider if you feel this is incorrect.

Your cache administrator is root.

Some forums says

transparent was deprecated and replaced with "intercept"

while others says otherwise.

Most confusing is, when http_port is set to transparent or intercept it gives the same result

The only thing that seems to work is: http_port 3128 accel vhost allow-direct

but i'm not comfortable with this because i do not think it was meant for transparent operations besides it blocks https sites on the squid host system.

Please i need advice on transparent mode best practices.

Is it http_port 3128 transparent or intercept or accel vhost allow-direct

which one is supported by the current version of squid 3.5.20 ?

Best Regards

Thanks

_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

--
Bugs to the Future

Attachment: 0x613DEC46.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users