You'r welcome. I do not understand what the hell you have clung to me. I have my own point of view on the problem. Tell tales of the guy who started this thread. I know the developer's position. So, let's stop useless discussion. This is wasted time only. 01.02.2017 21:48, Amos Jeffries пишет: > On 28/01/2017 1:35 a.m., Yuri wrote: >> I just want to have a choice and an opportunity to say - "F*ck you, man, >> I'm the System Administrator". > Does that go down well in parties or something? > >> If you do not want to violate the RFC - remove violations HTTP at all. >> If you remember, this mode is now enabled by default. > That mode does not mean what you seem to think it means. > > It means that *some* *specific* things which are known not to cause much > damage are allowed which violate HTTP _a little bit_ when it helps the > traffic work better. Most things it does is enabling Squid to detect and > talk with broken software that are themselves not quite following HTTP > right. > For example, a client forgetting to %20 some whitespace inside a URL. > >> You do not have to teach me that I use. I - an administrator and wish to >> be able to select tools. And do not be in a situation where the choice >> is made for me. >> > > Have you tried starting regular conversations with your friends and > family with the words "F*k you, man, I'm the System Administrator" so > they know that your way is always right no matter what. Then proceeding > to say everything else in the conversation at the loudest volume your > mouth can produce while injecting weird words randomly into each > sentence? just because you were created with those abilities you might > as well try using them. It definitely will make conversations short and > efficient (hmm.. just like 100% caching makes HTTP 'quick'). > > > Anyhow, my point is all languages have rules and protocols of behaviour > that have to be followed for the sentences/messages to be called > "speaking" that language. If you don't follow those rules you are simply > not speaking that language. You might be speaking some other language or > just being a weirdo - either way you are not speaking that language. > > HTTP is as much a language as any spoken one. It is just for Internet > software to 'talk' to each other. By not following its rules you are ... > well ... not using HTTP. > > What you keep saying about how you/admin "must" be allowed to violate > HTTP just because you are administrator and want to. That makes as much > sense as being proud about shouting at everyone you talk to in real > life. It's dumb, on a scale that demonstrates one is not worthy of the > privilege of being a sysadmin and can lead to early retirement in a > small padded cell. > > >>>> Antonio, you've seen at least once, so I complained about the >>>> consequences of my own actions? >>> You seem to continually complain that people are recommending not to >>> try going >>> against standards, or trying to defeat the anti-caching directives on >>> websites >>> you find. >>> >>> It's your choice to try doing that; people are saying "but if you do >>> that, bad >>> things will happen, or things will break, or it just won't work the >>> way you >>> want it to", and then you say "but I don't like having to follow the >>> rules". >>> >>> That's what I meant about complaining about the consequences of your >>> actions. >> It is my right and my choice. Personally, I do not complain of the >> consequences, having enough tools to solve any problem. >> > Hahahahaha "not complain about the consequences", ROFLMAO. > Thanks dude, I needed a good laugh today. > > Amos > > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users -- Bugs to the Future
Attachment:
0x613DEC46.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
