-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Well, http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept/LinuxRedirect http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept/LinuxDnat If I'm not stupid completely, this examples both uses NAT functionality. Yes or no? The question - what do we argue? Op originally wrote - "I have no iptables and so on." He needs specific guidance, not word games. So, no? 28.10.2016 1:04, Yuri Voinov пишет: > > (facepalm) > > rdr(REDIRECT) is NAT functionality? Yes or no? > > > 28.10.2016 0:59, Antony Stone пишет: > > On Thursday 27 October 2016 at 20:57:04, Yuri Voinov wrote: > > >> You know method to do this without NAT? ;) > > > I know how to do it without DNAT, which is what Eliezer recommended > and you > > challenged. > > > Antony. > > > - -- Cats - delicious. You just do not know how to cook them. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYElD4AAoJENNXIZxhPexG3d4H+wTllZGRI6URada+ifxa8mPe EnLO7Bviwe26VqvJZbmhIy9a9zX2tunykADk1cII45nIhBaoYVqMJe65p8NDox+z 4V0RJn0oU02nPpHM5RTwNxisfUFKqz+TvypL91c3AOApUqsWOftApt9AuWru3dV+ vwO+p4C7i0JQRPd1pSiK0JpAolg+QM4dJaxrJ/+Sqsr5PIKMtCngWy2VzDTPuhoe 6Gl1u3nqiWzfJRMoqfRyHowx7tNe06i/FlT5qR1NTJ1Iu3sGIlLZyShswwxk6SSs /w0W0jhcnArAJ4ITSP5X3CTRKw2GsgzPSIBlzchrt7SNfiVMxJ3GCpUw5F7qbk4= =Q1cn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Attachment:
0x613DEC46.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users