On Sunday 23 October 2016 at 15:26:54, Yuri Voinov wrote: > You can have slow DNS. Consider to use local caching DNS recursor as > source for proxy & users. Why would that result in requests via Squid being slower than direct? @Krishna: You *have* confirmed that Squid requests are slower than direct requests, for the same URL, at the same time, haven't you? Antony. > 23.10.2016 18:42, Krishna Kulkarni пишет: > > Hi Antony, > > Thanks for the reply. I have made changes in squid.conf as per your > > suggestion and have allocated 20 GB of Hard disk space. > > Squid server at my location handles http/https requests for more than > > 500 hosts. But at peak hours squid usually performs very slow and > > browser takes 1-2 minutes just to serve google home page and more time > > than that for heavy web page. > > > > I have verified network link utilization & found it consumes not more > > than 15 mb whereas link bandwidth is of 45mb but still squid serves web > > pages very slow to client hosts. > > > > Any suggestions in squid configuration to overcome this issue would be > > highly appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > Krishna. -- "If I've told you once, I've told you a million times - stop exaggerating!" Please reply to the list; please *don't* CC me. _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users