Search squid archive

Re: Squid 4.x and Peek and Splice - Host Header Forgery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2016-10-18 18:32, John Wright wrote:
Hi,

I have a constant problem with Host header forgery detection on squid
doing peek and splice.

I see this most commonly with CDN, Amazon and microsoft due to the
fact there TTL is only 5 seconds on certain dns entries im connecting
to.  So when my client connects through my squid i get host header
issues due to the contstant dns changes at these destinations.

I have ready many things online but how do i get around this.  I
basically want to allow certain domains or ip subnets to not hit the
host header error (as things break at this point for me ).

Any ideas ?

One example is

sls.update.microsoft.com [1]

Yes my client and Squid use same DNS server, i have even setup my
squid as a bind server and tried that just for fun same issue.  Fact
is the DNS at these places changes so fast (5 seconds) the dns
response keeps changing/

I just need these approved destinations to make it through



Links:
------
[1] http://sls.update.microsoft.com/

Hi,

Are you sure, that Squid and all your clients use same _caching_ DNS server? For example, here results from my server for name sls.update.microsoft.com:

$ dig sls.update.microsoft.com
...
sls.update.microsoft.com. 3345 IN CNAME sls.update.microsoft.com.nsatc.net.
sls.update.microsoft.com.nsatc.net. 215	IN A	157.56.77.141
...


Second request after 3 seconds:

$ dig sls.update.microsoft.com
...
sls.update.microsoft.com. 3342 IN CNAME sls.update.microsoft.com.nsatc.net.
sls.update.microsoft.com.nsatc.net. 212	IN A	157.56.77.141
...


Here I see that the TTL for the target A record is 300 seconds (not 5 seconds), and _caching_ DNS server will serve same A record for all clients at least 5 minutes. That behaviour will not introduce false positives for host forgery detection.



On other hand, if the DNS server is not _caching_, you would get different A records for each request. For example, below are results from authoritative DNS server for zone nsatc.net:


$ dig @e.ns.nsatc.net sls.update.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
...
sls.update.microsoft.com.nsatc.net. 300	IN A	157.55.240.220
...


Second request after 5 seconds:

$ dig @e.ns.nsatc.net sls.update.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
...
sls.update.microsoft.com.nsatc.net. 300	IN A	157.56.96.54
...


Here I see, that the DNS server serves exactly one A record in round-robin fashion. Same true for Google public DNS services. That behavior could cause troubles for host forgery detection.

HTH

Garri
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux