> Is there another defined somewhere else? For some reason your Squid is
> managing to build with just "nl_inip" (no 'addr') in the field name.
There's a copy in /usr/include/netinet, but it's the same:
typedef struct natlookup {
i6addr_t nl_inipaddr;
i6addr_t nl_outipaddr;
i6addr_t nl_realipaddr;
int nl_v;
int nl_flags;
u_short nl_inport;
u_short nl_outport;
u_short nl_realport;
} natlookup_t;
#define nl_inip nl_inipaddr.in4
#define nl_outip nl_outipaddr.in4
#define nl_realip nl_realipaddr.in4
#define nl_inip6 nl_inipaddr.in6
#define nl_outip6 nl_outipaddr.in6
#define nl_realip6 nl_realipaddr.in6
... so "nl_inip" is a simple #define to nl_inipaddr.in4
This is from Squid's Intercept.cc:
natLookup.nl_inport = htons(newConn->local.port());
newConn->local.getInAddr(natLookup.nl_inip);
natLookup.nl_outport = htons(newConn->remote.port());
newConn->remote.getInAddr(natLookup.nl_outip);
Is this correct?
Should we have this in the "else" section of
if (newConn->remote.isIPv6()) ... instead?
--
Gergely EGERVARY
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
